Case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 48

Case Study ExampleThere are similarities between the two leaders. They both support confabulation that is critical to any organizations success. Problems can be detected fast and allow decision makers to execute as illustrated in the charge sending a content informing the other party. In Semco giving opinions on opportunities and advancements gave room for participation and involvement to workers.Creativity and innovation was also a great mover of the two. natural endowment opportunities to both teams gave them a chance to exploit new ways of carrying out their respective duties. In Michaels ravish idea, the young were well trained tho they did not have a room for improvement. However, practicing discipline without formalism made them generate new ideas. It was amazing to see what it brought to the firm through removing bureaucratic ashes and empowering the workers.Flexibility, respect, dignity and maintaining quality of life drove the firms to success. In Semco, they could choo se the times for their respective duties, how to dress that motivated them. Offering responsibility and not orders, devotion changed the ship operationsHowever, the two differ in relation to their organizational philosophy where in the beginning Semler viewed an autocratic leaders style but later came to correct a democratic style. Michael was involved knowing every crewmember of the ship and better understood their problems and see how he could improve their lives. On the other hand, Semlers leadership was mainly concentrated on performance and strategies. He, however, was forced by circumstances in the end to listen to workers since they were the pillar to the firm.Change was essential Michaels ship was mainly changed through direct involvement of the young crewmembers bringing their ideas on board while Semco change came because of economic cycles and the firm had to do something to save its